Warning and Informing the Public
Background
The Government believes communicating with the public about emergencies is
essential. This section outlines what we mean by warning and informing the
public; and how organisations should go about raising public awareness of
the risks of emergencies, and warning them and providing information and
advice at the time of an emergency.
Why warn and inform?
The Government believes a well-informed public is better able to respond to
an emergency and to minimise the impact of the emergency on the community.
By informing the public as best they can, all organisations will build
their trust. Part of this is also avoiding alarming the public
unnecessarily.
Communicating before emergencies
Organisations should aim to make the public aware of the risks of
emergencies and how the organisation is prepared to deal with them if they
occur.
The risk section and
emergency
planning section provide more detail on how to go about risk assessment
and planning, and the importance of publishing this information. There is
also specific guidance available on Communicating
Risk [PDF, 80 Pages 4.2MB].
When deciding what to publish, organisations should consider whether
publication will assist in dealing with an emergency, particularly by
creating a more-informed public. It may make sense for organisations to
group together in publishing information. It may not be necessary to
publish whole risk assessments or plans. There may be sensitive information
which needs to be edited out. And organisations should aim to help the
public be alert but not alarmed - excessive information may alarm the
public unnecessarily.
The simplest and most cost-effective way of publishing information is on
the web. But paper copies should also be available where people do not have
access to the web (for instance, in public libraries). All materials
produced should look interesting and attractive enough for people to want
to read it - otherwise it will be a waste of resource. Particular care
should be taken to reach vulnerable people or those who may not understand
the message (such as the elderly or children in schools).
Being prepared to communicate during emergencies
In many circumstances, it will be the Government that first provides
warning that an emergency is about to occur or is occurring. The Government
is ready to warn and inform the public about the whole range of possible
emergencies.
But other organisations may need to ensure they too have arrangements in
place to warn, inform and advise the public. In particular, organisations
whose functions are likely seriously to be obstructed by an emergency or
those who expect to take action in relation to that emergency and would
require a redeployment of resources or additional resources to do so (e.g.
emergency services or Local Authorities).
Confusion would be caused, however, if more than one organisation were to
plan to warn the public about the same risk at the same time to the same
extent. To avoid duplication, those organisations whose functions are
affected by an emergency should aim to co-operate and identify which
organisation will take lead responsibility for warning and informing in
regard to a particular emergency. Organisations should also ensure that
they do not duplicate warning arrangements which may already be in place in
other organisations. For instance, utilities companies have a duty under
their own regulatory frameworks to provide warning, information and advice
in certain circumstances when their services are interrupted.
As with any other part of planning for response to an emergency, the
communications strategy for warning and informing - either direct with the
public, or via the media - should be fully integrated into the
responder's emergency plans. Organisations should test their warning
and informing arrangements as they would emergency plans, through
exercising and providing training to staff. Just as there may be generic
and specific emergency plans, so there may be generic and specific
arrangements for warning and informing, depending on the type of emergency
being planned for and the particular circumstances in a locality. The emergency
planning section provides more detail.
What information is needed when?
Organisations engaged in warning and informing will need to think carefully
about what information different audiences will want, and when, in an
emergency.
For instance, immediately when an emergency occurs, and during the first
hour...
The PUBLIC NEEDS:
-
basic details of the incident - what, where, when (and who, why and how,
if possible);
-
to know the implications for health and welfare;
-
advice and guidance (eg stay indoors, symptoms, preparing for
evacuation); and
-
reassurance (if necessary).
The PUBLIC WANTS to know:
-
other practical implications such as the effect on traffic, power
supplies, telephones, water supplies, etc;
-
a helpline number; and
-
what is being done to resolve the situation.
BROADCASTERS will REQUIRE:
-
well-thought-out and joined-up arrangements between the emergency
services, local authority and other organisations, capable of providing
agreed information at speed;
-
an immediate telephone contact; and
-
a media rendezvous point at the scene. (adapted from the BBC's -
Connecting in a Crisis [External website])
Warning methods
The methods available to deliver urgent information to members of the
public are extremely varied. Some depend on the availability of power
supplies or phone lines. Some may require careful consideration of the
risks to human life and health, in case at the time of an emergency staff
or members of the public are exposed to hazardous substances while they are
warning or being warned.
Some warning methods include:
-
Mobilising officers to go round on foot and knock on doors;
-
From car or helicopter, by loudhailer or other amplified means;
-
Media announcements;
-
Electronic/variable message boards, eg at the roadside or on motorways;
-
Direct radio broadcasts to shipping (in maritime incidents);
-
PA announcements in public buildings, shopping centres, sports venues,
transport systems, etc.;
-
Automated telephone/fax/e-mail/text messages to subscribers; and
-
Site sirens.
Working with the media
All organisations should be familiar with the media organisations and
outlets in their own areas, and should aim to develop good relations with
them. There is a considerable amount of advice on how to achieve this in
the BBC's -
Connecting in a Crisis [External website]
initiative.
It is clear that great damage can be done in communications in an
emergency. The damage done to public confidence by the release of
inconsistent and contradictory messages can be hard to repair. Similarly,
great damage can be done by speculation about causes or future
developments. It is better to say when something is not known than to
guess, particularly if this is going to raise the hopes of the affected
public - for example, about when they can return to their homes.
The key to effective communication with the public is getting the message
right for the right audience. How information and advice are delivered can
greatly affect how they are received. Organisations should give careful
thought ahead of any emergency about who may act as their official
spokespeople and undertake media interviews. Clearly these people will need
suitable training. Other public-facing people in the organisation should
have a basic level of information so that they can handle inquiries
confidently.
Warning and informing at the local level
The Civil Contingencies Act includes public awareness and warning and
informing as two distinct legal duties for Category 1 responders - advising
the public of risks before an emergency and maintaining arrangements to
warn and keep them informed in the event of an emergency.
The duties to assess risks and to prepare plans are coupled with a further
duty to publish all or part of this information where it is necessary or
desirable to prevent, reduce, control, mitigate or take other action in
connection with an emergency.
The Act Regulations allow for Category 1 responders to co-operate for the
purpose of identifying an organisation which will have lead responsibility
for maintaining arrangements to warn in regard to a particular emergency.
Warning, informing and advising the public is not a stand-alone duty. It
should be integrated into the responder's emergency plans, and just as
there may be generic and specific plans, so there may be generic and
specific warning and informing arrangements. Likewise, just as emergency
plans should make provision for training and carrying out exercises, so
should warning and informing arrangements.
The Act allows for Category 1 responders to discharge their duties
collaboratively.
In many areas, particularly those where there are long-standing known
hazards such as nuclear power stations or extensive industrial complexes,
there are also local groupings of organisations and the media.
Warning and informing at the regional and Devolved Administration level
Regional Media Emergency Forums (RMEFs) are in place in every English
region as part of the regional resilience framework. Through RMEFs,
regional media, government representatives, emergency planners, emergency
services and other interested bodies work together to help ensure that all
parties can operate more effectively when an emergency occurs. Their work
includes preparing useful standard background material in advance, planning
practical arrangements and building trust and confidence on all sides.
They work alongside Regional Resilience Teams.
Wales has its own MEF.
Warning and informing at the UK level
Public information produced by the Government
The Government believes communicating with the public about emergencies is
essential. The Preparing for Emergencies
booklet, publishing general advice and delivered to all households, is a
key example of efforts to raise public awareness about risks and
preparedness for a number of types of emergency, including
terrorist-related emergencies.
Media Emergency Forum (MEF)
Through the UK Media Emergency Forum (MEF), senior media editors,
government representatives and representatives of local responders work
together to help ensure that all parties can operate more effectively when
an emergency occurs. Their work includes identification and discussion of
strategic communications issues, overarching policy for engagement of the
media in civil protection work at every level, planning practical
arrangements for media involvement during emergencies and building trust
and confidence on all sides.
Key Documents
You should refer to:
-
Emergency
Preparedness, Chapter 7: "Communicating with the
public" [PDF, 16 pages, 84KB] (pp93-108)
-
Emergency
Preparedness, Chapter 4: "Local responder risk assessment
duty" [PDF, 13 pages, 103KB] (pp34-46)
- Annex 4A:
"Summary of the six-step local risk assessment
process" [PDF, 3 pages, 27KB]
- Annex 4B:
"Illustration of a Local Risk Assessment Guidance
(LRAG)" [PDF, 7 pages, 41KB]
- Annex 4C:
"Example of an individual risk
assessment" [PDF, 2 pages, 25KB]
- Annex 4D:
"Likelihood and impact scoring
scales" [PDF, 3 pages, 28KB]
- Annex 4E:
"Community Risk Register" [PDF, 1 page,
22KB]
- Annex 4F:
"Risk rating matrix" [PDF, 2 pages,
19KB]
-
Emergency
Preparedness, Chapter 5: "Emergency
planning" [PDF, 27 pages, 130KB] (pp47-73)
-
Emergency
Response and Recovery, Chapter 6: "Information and the
media" [PDF, 8 pages, 49KB] (pp43-50)
-
Lead
Responder Protocol [PDF, 18 pages, 140KB]
-
The Ten Step
Cycle – an informal guidance note [PDF, 15 pages,
124KB]
-
Guidance document Communicating
Risk [PDF, 80 Pages 4.2MB]
-
Media Emergency Forums
& RMEFs First Annual Report 2003-2004 [PDF, 30 pages,
1.34MB]
Key Links
Training
-
The Emergency Planning College
(EPC) [External website] is the leading provider
of training for emergency preparedness, attracting delegates with
responsibility for preventing, planning for, responding to or recovering
from a major incident. The EPC runs these courses on the care of people
as well as other aspects of civil protection:
Other Documents
You may also wish to refer to:
Other Links
[return to top]