National Capabilities Survey, 2006
The National Capabilities Survey was launched on 2 February 2006. The
Survey is part of the Government's programme to make the country more
resilient to disruptive events. Conducted every other year, it will provide
an up to date picture of preparedness, and help plan improvements.
The first full Survey followed a few months after the provisions of the
Civil Contingencies Act 2004 came into effect, in November 2005. It shows
that there have been improvements since a more limited 'mapping
exercise' first examined the preparedness of local responders for
emergencies, in 2003/04.
Background
Aims and Objectives
The National Capabilities1 Survey
(NCS) provides an assessment of current levels of national resilience to
inform national policies and prioritisation of investment in resilience. It
will do so by gathering information from a wide range of resilience
stakeholders, in several different sectors and at all levels of resilience
planning.
The survey will play a key role in assessing the UK's readiness to
respond to a range of assessed risks, be they terrorist attacks or natural
hazards such as flooding. The results of the survey will help to improve
our understanding of national preparedness and inform priorities for future
investment, exercises and policy development.
Approach
The NCS has been developed by the Civil Contingencies Secretariat and the
Department for Communities and Local Government, in collaboration with Lead
Government Departments and the Cabinet Office's Social Research Unit.
A range of questionnaires are issued, each tailored to their intended
audience and designed with the aim of collecting specific information
relating to capabilities. Wherever possible the NCS will rely on data
collated from existing initiatives and information sources rather than
place an extra burden on responders.
The survey will be carried out every two years to ensure that we continue
to improve our preparedness on the basis of up to date information.
2006 NCS Overview
The National Capabilities Survey 2006 was completed in Summer 2006. The
Survey built on the successful Regional Capability Mapping Exercise led by
the Department for Communities and Local Government in 2003/04. The 2006
exercise was broader and more comprehensive in its scope, covering not one
but three strands:
-
Local response: questionnaires were issued to over 500 groups of Category
1 responders under the Civil Contingencies Act, including every local
authority (upper and lower tier), police force, fire brigade, coroner and
the Environment Agency in England and Wales. There was, overall, a 90%
response to the survey which asked some 250 questions about a range of
'capabilities' relevant to local responders' responsibilities
for emergency planning and response.
-
Organisations providing essential services (including for example gas,
electricity, water supplies, but also the National Health Service) were
asked questions concerning their ability to maintain business continuity
in the event of disruptive events. Overall there was a 71% response to
the Survey.
-
Questionnaires were sent to the nine regional government offices in
England and the Welsh Assembly Government co-ordinated the survey in
Wales.
-
Also, over 20 government departments with a leading role in the event of
a crisis, or who need a crisis management capability, were asked about
their planning, business continuity arrangements and functional
capabilties.
The survey results will be treated in confidence and will be used by the
government to inform future resilience planning.
The survey suggests that:
-
The UK has a good level of preparedness overall. Where comparisons can be
made with the more limited 2003 mapping exercise the local response
results demonstrate clear signs of improvement in specific areas, such as
in planning to respond to a human influenza pandemic.
-
Preparedness for less clear-cut eventualities is well developed:
'generic' capabilities (for example: against the event of a
chemical, biological or radiological (CBR) incident; for urban search
& rescue tasks) have benefited from investment and heightened
interest.
-
Likewise, multi-agency cooperation seems to have benefited from emphasis
on partnership in the Civil Contingencies Act: for example in local
authorities' plans to assist NHS in dealing with mass casualties and
mass fatalities; and cooperation also with DEFRA/State Veterinary
Services in dealing with infectious animal diseases.
-
Although planning for emergencies at the local level is well-established
and has improved significantly, there is scope for making the review and
exercise of plans more systematic.
-
Within the
essential service workstreams there is a good level of business
continuity and crisis management. Planning for specific scenarios is also
good but less developed than generic planning.
-
There is little regional variation in preparedness; however there are
differences at the local level within regions. This suggests that there
are more significant differences in the challenges faced at a local level
within any given region, than between regions.
-
Central government's core response capabilities are well-developed.
Departmental business continuity plans are in place and are being
exercised.
1 'Capability'
is a military term which includes both personnel, equipment and training
and such matters as plans, doctrine and the concept of operations.
[return to top]